Twins barbers / Twins Hair Atelier
Hairdresser · Amsterdam Nieuw-West, Amsterdam
4.062 reviews · GoogleTwins barbers / Twins Hair Atelier in Amsterdam is listed under Hairdresser. The listing shows 2 services. On Google it has 4.0 out of 5 from 62 reviews.
About Twins barbers / Twins Hair Atelier
Twins barbers / Twins Hair Atelier is a hair salon in Amsterdam Nieuw-West.
Practical information
- Wheelchair-accessible entrance
Services and prices
- Haircut
- Beard care
At a glance
| Listed under | Hairdresser |
|---|---|
| Location | Johan Huizingalaan 132, 1065 JE Amsterdam |
| Number of services | 2 |
| Google rating | 4.0 out of 5 (62 reviews) |
| Weekend | Saturday, Sunday |
| Phone | 06 28198291 |
| Last updated | 31 Oct 2026 |
Ratings
- 4.0Google62 reviews
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
Frequently asked questions
What does Twins barbers / Twins Hair Atelier offer?
Twins barbers / Twins Hair Atelier lists 2 services, including Haircut and Beard care.
Where is Twins barbers / Twins Hair Atelier?
At Johan Huizingalaan 132, 1065 JE Amsterdam.
When is Twins barbers / Twins Hair Atelier open?
Monday 09:30–19:30, Tuesday 09:30–19:30, Wednesday 09:30–19:30, Thursday 09:30–19:30, Friday 09:00–19:30, Saturday 09:00–19:30, Sunday 09:00–19:30. Check with the business before you go.
How do I book with Twins barbers / Twins Hair Atelier?
Call 06 28198291.
How is Twins barbers / Twins Hair Atelier rated?
On Google, Twins barbers / Twins Hair Atelier has 4.0 out of 5 from 62 reviews.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Johan Huizingalaan 132, 1065 JE Amsterdam
Twins barbers / Twins Hair Atelier does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
| Monday | 09:30–19:30 |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 09:30–19:30 |
| Wednesday | 09:30–19:30 |
| Thursday | 09:30–19:30 |
| Friday | 09:00–19:30 |
| Saturday | 09:00–19:30 |
| Sunday | 09:00–19:30 |
Something not right? Suggest a correction
