Kapsalon De Toekomst
Hairdresser · Amsterdam Nieuw-West, Amsterdam
4.994 reviews · GoogleKapsalon De Toekomst in Amsterdam is listed under Hairdresser. On Google it has 4.9 out of 5 from 94 reviews.
About Kapsalon De Toekomst
Kapsalon De Toekomst is a hair salon in Amsterdam. The team provides tailored work and adapts services to the customer, their goals, business or project.
Approach
The team consists of three people and calls the work its passion. Services can be tailored to goals, a business or a project.
Services
The hair salon provides tailored work and looks for solutions that match the customer's wishes.
At a glance
| Listed under | Hairdresser |
|---|---|
| Location | Johan Huizingalaan 177b, 1065 HZ Amsterdam |
| Google rating | 4.9 out of 5 (94 reviews) |
| Weekend | Saturday, Sunday |
| Phone | 020 789 4627 |
| Website | kapsalon-de-toekomst-1.jimdosite.com |
| Last updated | October 2026 |
Ratings
- 4.9Google94 reviews
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
Frequently asked questions
Where is Kapsalon De Toekomst?
At Johan Huizingalaan 177b, 1065 HZ Amsterdam.
When is Kapsalon De Toekomst open?
Monday 10:00–18:00, Tuesday 10:00–18:00, Wednesday 10:00–18:00, Thursday 10:00–18:00, Friday 10:00–18:00, Saturday 09:00–18:00, Sunday 10:00–18:00. Check with the business before you go.
How do I book with Kapsalon De Toekomst?
Call 020 789 4627. Or contact the business through its website.
How is Kapsalon De Toekomst rated?
On Google, Kapsalon De Toekomst has 4.9 out of 5 from 94 reviews.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Johan Huizingalaan 177b, 1065 HZ Amsterdam
Kapsalon De Toekomst does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
| Monday | 10:00–18:00 |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 10:00–18:00 |
| Wednesday | 10:00–18:00 |
| Thursday | 10:00–18:00 |
| Friday | 10:00–18:00 |
| Saturday | 09:00–18:00 |
| Sunday | 10:00–18:00 |
Something not right? Suggest a correction
