Vink Administratie
Bookkeeper · Zwolle
5.03 reviews · GoogleVink Administratie in Zwolle is listed under Bookkeeper. The listing shows 4 services. On Google it has 5.0 out of 5 from 3 reviews.
About Vink Administratie
Vink Administratie provides administrative services for business owners and private individuals in Zwolle. It helps with bookkeeping, administration and tax returns.
Services offered
Services are tailored to each client and include processing and checking records, VAT returns and income tax returns.
- Processing and checking records
- VAT return
- Income tax return
How it works
Vink Administratie tailors its services to the client’s wishes and circumstances. A meeting can be arranged to discuss questions and options.
- Tailored administration
- Arrange a meeting
Services and prices
- Processing and checking records
- VAT return
- Income tax
- Tailored administration
At a glance
| Listed under | Bookkeeper |
|---|---|
| Location | Goudsbloemstraat 127, 8012 XL Zwolle |
| Number of services | 4 |
| Google rating | 5.0 out of 5 (3 reviews) |
| Phone | 06 23484144 |
| Website | vinkadministratie.nl |
| Last updated | October 2026 |
Ratings
- 5.0Google3 reviews
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
Frequently asked questions
What does Vink Administratie offer?
Vink Administratie lists 4 services, including Processing and checking records, VAT return, Income tax and Tailored administration.
Where is Vink Administratie?
At Goudsbloemstraat 127, 8012 XL Zwolle.
How do I book with Vink Administratie?
Call 06 23484144. Or contact the business through its website.
How is Vink Administratie rated?
On Google, Vink Administratie has 5.0 out of 5 from 3 reviews.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Goudsbloemstraat 127, 8012 XL Zwolle
Vink Administratie does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
Opening hours not known
Something not right? Suggest a correction
