Maestro
Hairdresser · Utrecht
4.81,988 reviews · GoogleMaestro in Utrecht is listed under Hairdresser. The listing shows 3 services. On Google it has 4.8 out of 5 from 1,988 reviews.
About Maestro
Maestro is a hairdresser, barber, beauty salon, make-up artist, and nail studio in Utrecht.
Offerings
- Cutting and styling
- Highlights balayage
- Deluxe women's treatment
Practical information
You can make an appointment online.
Services and prices
- Cutting and styling
- Highlights balayage
- Deluxe women's treatment
At a glance
| Listed under | Hairdresser, Barber, Beauty specialist, Make-up artist |
|---|---|
| Location | Wittevrouwenstraat 36, 3512 CV Utrecht |
| Number of services | 3 |
| Google rating | 4.8 out of 5 (1,988 reviews) |
| Weekend | Saturday, Sunday |
| Phone | 030 207 2271 |
| Website | maestro-design.nl |
| Last updated | 31 Oct 2026 |
Ratings
- 4.8Google1,988 reviews
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
Frequently asked questions
What does Maestro offer?
Maestro lists 3 services, including Cutting and styling, Highlights balayage and Deluxe women's treatment.
Where is Maestro?
At Wittevrouwenstraat 36, 3512 CV Utrecht.
When is Maestro open?
Monday 09:00–19:00, Tuesday 09:00–19:00, Wednesday 09:00–19:00, Thursday 09:00–20:00, Friday 09:00–19:30, Saturday 09:00–17:00, Sunday 10:00–17:00. Check with the business before you go.
How do I book with Maestro?
Call 030 207 2271. Or contact the business through its website.
How is Maestro rated?
On Google, Maestro has 4.8 out of 5 from 1,988 reviews.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Wittevrouwenstraat 36, 3512 CV Utrecht
Maestro does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
| Monday | 09:00–19:00 |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 09:00–19:00 |
| Wednesday | 09:00–19:00 |
| Thursday | 09:00–20:00 |
| Friday | 09:00–19:30 |
| Saturday | 09:00–17:00 |
| Sunday | 10:00–17:00 |
Something not right? Suggest a correction
