Verweel Smit Advocaten
Lawyer · Spijkenisse
Verweel Smit Advocaten in Spijkenisse is listed under Lawyer. The listing shows 9 services.
About Verweel Smit Advocaten
Verweel Smit Advocaten is a law firm in Spijkenisse that assists business owners. The firm handles areas including corporate law, employment law, construction law and tenancy law.
Areas of law
The firm lists various business-related areas of law and services for business owners.
- Corporate law
- Contracts and general terms and conditions
- Employment law
- Construction law and real estate
- Tenancy law
- Liability law
- Administrative law
- (International) transport law
- Attachment and enforcement law
Firm structure
The firm is a partnership of two private limited companies. Services are provided under an engagement with the BV of the relevant lawyer.
Services and prices
- Corporate law
- Contracts and general terms and conditions
- Employment law
- Construction law/real estate
- Tenancy law
- Liability law
- Administrative law
- (Int.) transport law
- Attachment and enforcement law
At a glance
| Listed under | Lawyer |
|---|---|
| Location | Kon. Julianaplein 12, 3201 CH Spijkenisse |
| Number of services | 9 |
| Phone | 0181 619 099 |
| Website | mrpsmit.nl |
| Last updated | October 2026 |
Frequently asked questions
What does Verweel Smit Advocaten offer?
Verweel Smit Advocaten lists 9 services, including Corporate law, Contracts and general terms and conditions, Employment law, Construction law/real estate and Tenancy law.
Where is Verweel Smit Advocaten?
At Kon. Julianaplein 12, 3201 CH Spijkenisse.
How do I book with Verweel Smit Advocaten?
Call 0181 619 099. Or contact the business through its website.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Kon. Julianaplein 12, 3201 CH Spijkenisse
Verweel Smit Advocaten does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
Opening hours not known
Something not right? Suggest a correction
