Wodstylez - Blueprint Studio
Gym · Rotterdam
4.823 reviews · GoogleWodstylez - Blueprint Studio in Rotterdam is listed under Gym. The listing shows 2 services. On Google it has 4.8 out of 5 from 23 reviews.
About Wodstylez - Blueprint Studio
Wodstylez - Blueprint Studio is a gym in Rotterdam.
Practical information
- Wheelchair-accessible parking
Services and prices
- Group training
- CrossFit
At a glance
| Listed under | Gym |
|---|---|
| Location | Satijnbloem 33, 3068 JP Rotterdam |
| Number of services | 2 |
| Google rating | 4.8 out of 5 (23 reviews) |
| Weekend | Saturday, Sunday |
| Website | wodstylezblueprintstudio.com |
| Last updated | October 2026 |
Ratings
- 4.8Google23 reviews
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
Frequently asked questions
What does Wodstylez - Blueprint Studio offer?
Wodstylez - Blueprint Studio lists 2 services, including Group training and CrossFit.
Where is Wodstylez - Blueprint Studio?
At Satijnbloem 33, 3068 JP Rotterdam.
When is Wodstylez - Blueprint Studio open?
Monday 06:30–13:00, 17:00–20:30, Tuesday 06:30–13:00, 17:00–20:30, Wednesday 06:30–13:00, 17:00–20:30, Thursday 06:30–13:00, 17:00–20:30, Friday 06:30–13:00, Saturday 08:00–12:00, Sunday 08:00–12:45. Check with the business before you go.
How do I book with Wodstylez - Blueprint Studio?
Or contact the business through its website.
How is Wodstylez - Blueprint Studio rated?
On Google, Wodstylez - Blueprint Studio has 4.8 out of 5 from 23 reviews.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Satijnbloem 33, 3068 JP Rotterdam
Wodstylez - Blueprint Studio does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
| Monday | 06:30–13:00, 17:00–20:30 |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 06:30–13:00, 17:00–20:30 |
| Wednesday | 06:30–13:00, 17:00–20:30 |
| Thursday | 06:30–13:00, 17:00–20:30 |
| Friday | 06:30–13:00 |
| Saturday | 08:00–12:00 |
| Sunday | 08:00–12:45 |
Something not right? Suggest a correction
