Vintage Beauty Nature Cosmetics
Beauty specialist · Rotterdam
5.011 reviews · GoogleVintage Beauty Nature Cosmetics in Rotterdam is listed under Beauty specialist. The listing shows 1 services. On Google it has 5.0 out of 5 from 11 reviews.
About Vintage Beauty Nature Cosmetics
Vintage Beauty Nature Cosmetics is a beauty salon and cosmetics shop in Rotterdam. The shop offers facial treatments and sells products.
Services
- Facial treatment
- Cosmetics products
Practical information
- Wheelchair-accessible parking
Services and prices
- Facial treatment
At a glance
| Listed under | Beauty specialist |
|---|---|
| Location | Freericksplaats 5, 3054 GJ Rotterdam |
| Number of services | 1 |
| Google rating | 5.0 out of 5 (11 reviews) |
| Weekend | Saturday |
| Phone | 010 840 7005 |
| Last updated | October 2026 |
Ratings
- 5.0Google11 reviews
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
Frequently asked questions
What does Vintage Beauty Nature Cosmetics offer?
Vintage Beauty Nature Cosmetics lists 1 services, including Facial treatment.
Where is Vintage Beauty Nature Cosmetics?
At Freericksplaats 5, 3054 GJ Rotterdam.
When is Vintage Beauty Nature Cosmetics open?
Tuesday 10:00–17:00, Wednesday 10:00–17:00, Thursday 10:00–17:00, Friday 10:00–17:00, Saturday 10:00–16:00. Check with the business before you go.
How do I book with Vintage Beauty Nature Cosmetics?
Call 010 840 7005.
How is Vintage Beauty Nature Cosmetics rated?
On Google, Vintage Beauty Nature Cosmetics has 5.0 out of 5 from 11 reviews.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Freericksplaats 5, 3054 GJ Rotterdam
Vintage Beauty Nature Cosmetics does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
| Monday | Closed |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 10:00–17:00 |
| Wednesday | 10:00–17:00 |
| Thursday | 10:00–17:00 |
| Friday | 10:00–17:00 |
| Saturday | 10:00–16:00 |
| Sunday | Closed |
Something not right? Suggest a correction
