RM Fysio & Performance
Physiotherapy · Rotterdam
4.712 reviews · GoogleRM Fysio & Performance in Rotterdam is listed under Physiotherapy. The listing shows 4 services. On Google it has 4.7 out of 5 from 12 reviews.

About RM Fysio & Performance
RM Fysio & Performance is a physiotherapy practice in Rotterdam.
Services offered
- Connective tissue treatment
- Dry needling
- Percutaneous electrolysis
- Exercises
Accessibility
- Wheelchair-accessible toilet
Services and prices
- Connective tissue treatment
- Dry needling
- Percutaneous electrolysis
- Exercises
At a glance
| Listed under | Physiotherapy |
|---|---|
| Location | Ommoordseweg 32, 3056 JP Rotterdam |
| Number of services | 4 |
| Google rating | 4.7 out of 5 (12 reviews) |
| Weekend | Closed at the weekend |
| Phone | 06 16013934 |
| Website | rmfysioperformance.nl |
| Last updated | October 2026 |
Ratings
- 4.7Google12 reviews
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
Frequently asked questions
What does RM Fysio & Performance offer?
RM Fysio & Performance lists 4 services, including Connective tissue treatment, Dry needling, Percutaneous electrolysis and Exercises.
Where is RM Fysio & Performance?
At Ommoordseweg 32, 3056 JP Rotterdam.
When is RM Fysio & Performance open?
Tuesday 08:00–18:00, Thursday 08:00–17:00. Check with the business before you go.
How do I book with RM Fysio & Performance?
Call 06 16013934. Or contact the business through its website.
How is RM Fysio & Performance rated?
On Google, RM Fysio & Performance has 4.7 out of 5 from 12 reviews.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Ommoordseweg 32, 3056 JP Rotterdam
RM Fysio & Performance does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
| Monday | Closed |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 08:00–18:00 |
| Wednesday | Closed |
| Thursday | 08:00–17:00 |
| Friday | Closed |
| Saturday | Closed |
| Sunday | Closed |
Something not right? Suggest a correction






