Madoptix NL
Optician · Rotterdam
Madoptix NL in Rotterdam is listed under Optician.

About Madoptix NL
MADOPTIX NL is an optical business in Rotterdam Zuid. It offers individual advice and has experience with online technology and eye care.
Advice and experience
The focus is on individual advice and taking time to analyse the intended plan. The owner says they have 30 years of experience.
- Individual advice
- Advice about eye care and technology
Online and technology
MADOPTIX NL has experience with Google Ads, Facebook Ads, Google listings and SEO. MADOPTIX NL also has plans to create websites and integrate technical features and social media.
- Google Ads
- Facebook Ads
- Google listings
- SEO
Optics forum
There is a Facebook group for eye care professionals. Membership is free, and opticians can sell instruments to each other free of charge.
- Facebook group for eye care professionals
- Sale of instruments between opticians
At a glance
| Listed under | Optician, Consultancy |
|---|---|
| Location | Millinxstraat 54b, 3081 PP Rotterdam |
| Weekend | Saturday |
| Phone | +49 160 90552211 |
| Website | alexander-duyverman.com |
| Last updated | October 2026 |
Frequently asked questions
Where is Madoptix NL?
At Millinxstraat 54b, 3081 PP Rotterdam.
When is Madoptix NL open?
Monday 00:00–24:00, Tuesday 00:00–24:00, Wednesday 00:00–24:00, Thursday 00:00–24:00, Friday 00:00–24:00, Saturday 00:00–24:00. Check with the business before you go.
How do I book with Madoptix NL?
Call +49 160 90552211. Or contact the business through its website.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Millinxstraat 54b, 3081 PP Rotterdam
Madoptix NL does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
| Monday | 00:00–24:00 |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 00:00–24:00 |
| Wednesday | 00:00–24:00 |
| Thursday | 00:00–24:00 |
| Friday | 00:00–24:00 |
| Saturday | 00:00–24:00 |
| Sunday | Closed |
Something not right? Suggest a correction






