Ezoncs
Nail studio · Rotterdam
4.8622 reviews · GoogleEzoncs in Rotterdam is listed under Nail studio. The listing shows 4 services. On Google it has 4.8 out of 5 from 622 reviews.
About Ezoncs
Ezoncs is a nail salon and beauty salon in Rotterdam.
Offerings
The salon offers nail treatments, including manicures, pedicures and Russian manicures.
- Manicure
- Russian manicure
- Pedicure
- Nail extensions
Practical information
- Wheelchair-accessible entrance
- Wheelchair-accessible parking
Services and prices
- Manicure
- Russian manicure
- Pedicure
- Nail extensions
At a glance
| Listed under | Nail studio, Beauty specialist, Laser hair removal |
|---|---|
| Location | Bredestraat 316, 3011 RE Rotterdam |
| Number of services | 4 |
| Google rating | 4.8 out of 5 (622 reviews) |
| Weekend | Saturday, Sunday |
| Phone | 06 86278030 |
| Website | ezoncs.com |
| Last updated | 31 Oct 2026 |
Ratings
- 4.8Google622 reviews
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
Frequently asked questions
What does Ezoncs offer?
Ezoncs lists 4 services, including Manicure, Russian manicure, Pedicure and Nail extensions.
Where is Ezoncs?
At Bredestraat 316, 3011 RE Rotterdam.
When is Ezoncs open?
Monday 09:00–21:30, Tuesday 09:00–22:00, Wednesday 09:00–22:00, Thursday 09:00–22:00, Friday 08:00–22:00, Saturday 08:00–22:00, Sunday 08:00–21:30. Check with the business before you go.
How do I book with Ezoncs?
Call 06 86278030. Or contact the business through its website.
How is Ezoncs rated?
On Google, Ezoncs has 4.8 out of 5 from 622 reviews.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Bredestraat 316, 3011 RE Rotterdam
Ezoncs does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
| Monday | 09:00–21:30 |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 09:00–22:00 |
| Wednesday | 09:00–22:00 |
| Thursday | 09:00–22:00 |
| Friday | 08:00–22:00 |
| Saturday | 08:00–22:00 |
| Sunday | 08:00–21:30 |
Something not right? Suggest a correction
