Reijm Tuinaanleg B.V.
Handyman
4.855 reviews · GoogleThe listing shows 9 services. On Google it has 4.8 out of 5 from 55 reviews. The business comes to you.

About Reijm Tuinaanleg B.V.
Reijm Tuinaanleg B.V. provides garden landscaping in Moordrecht and the surrounding area. The company creates complete gardens and builds custom canopies, from design to installation.
Services
Reijm Tuinaanleg offers services for complete gardens and custom woodwork. The team guides clients from the initial design to the final stone.
- Garden design
- Garden landscaping
- Garden renovation
- Custom woodwork, including fences, decking and pergolas
- Custom canopies
How we work
Each garden project has one dedicated point of contact from start to finish. The team works with you and gives tailored advice.
Service area
Reijm Tuinaanleg works in Moordrecht and the surrounding area.
- Moordrecht
- Surrounding area
Services and prices
- Garden landscaping
- Garden design
- Garden renovation
- Woodwork
- Fences
- Decking
- Pergolas
- Custom canopies
- Veranda
At a glance
| Listed under | Handyman |
|---|---|
| Location | Comes to you |
| Number of services | 9 |
| Google rating | 4.8 out of 5 (55 reviews) |
| Phone | 06 14545950 |
| Website | reijmtuinaanleg.nl |
| Last updated | October 2026 |
Ratings
- 4.8Google55 reviews
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
Frequently asked questions
What does Reijm Tuinaanleg B.V. offer?
Reijm Tuinaanleg B.V. lists 9 services, including Garden landscaping, Garden design, Garden renovation, Woodwork and Fences.
How do I book with Reijm Tuinaanleg B.V.?
Call 06 14545950. Or contact the business through its website.
How is Reijm Tuinaanleg B.V. rated?
On Google, Reijm Tuinaanleg B.V. has 4.8 out of 5 from 55 reviews.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Comes to you
Reijm Tuinaanleg B.V. does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
Opening hours
Opening hours not known
Something not right? Suggest a correction