Peter van der Lingen Bruidsfotografie
Photographer
5.022 reviews · GooglePeter van der Lingen photographs weddings and offers collections with photography, photos and albums.
About Peter van der Lingen Bruidsfotografie
Peter van der Lingen Bruidsfotografie is a wedding photographer. Peter photographs weddings, looking for moments between the couple, friends and family.
Wedding photography
Peter photographs on wedding days and handles selection and editing. The collections include different numbers of hours of photography, photos and online galleries; some also include a wedding album and online backup.
- Premium Wedding Collection: up to 6 hours of photography, 250 photos, online gallery and 1 year of online backup
- Exclusive Album Collection: up to 8 hours of photography, 300 photos and a 25 × 25 wedding album with 60 photos
- Luxury Album Collection: up to 10 hours of photography, 400 photos, a 25 × 25 wedding album with 80 photos and 2 years of online backup
Working method
Each collection includes an online introductory meeting, photography on the wedding day, selection and editing, an online photo gallery and digital files.
Services and prices
- Premium Wedding Collection360 min · €1995
- Exclusive Album Collection480 min · €2795
- Luxury Album Collection600 min · €3195
Prices are indicative. Check with the business before you go.
At a glance
| Listed under | Photographer, Wedding photographer |
|---|---|
| Location | Comes to you |
| Number of services | 3 |
| Prices | €1995 – €3195 |
| Google rating | 5.0 out of 5 (22 reviews) |
| Languages | Nederlands |
| Phone | 06 14931136 |
| Website | petervanderlingen.nl |
| Last updated | October 2026 |
Ratings
- 5.0Google22 reviews
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Comes to you
Peter van der Lingen Bruidsfotografie does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
Opening hours
Opening hours not known
Something not right? Suggest a correction