Jordy Brada Fotografie
Photographer · Ouderkerk aan den IJssel
5.019 reviews · GoogleJordy Brada Fotografie in Ouderkerk aan den IJssel is listed under Photographer. The listing shows 2 services. On Google it has 5.0 out of 5 from 19 reviews.

About Jordy Brada Fotografie
Jordy Brada Fotografie is a photographer in Ouderkerk aan den IJssel.
Offerings
- Photo shoots
- Maternity photography
Practical information
- Wheelchair-accessible parking
Services and prices
- Photo shoot
- Maternity photography
At a glance
| Listed under | Photographer |
|---|---|
| Location | Zijdepark 19, 2935 LB Ouderkerk aan den IJssel |
| Number of services | 2 |
| Google rating | 5.0 out of 5 (19 reviews) |
| Weekend | Saturday, Sunday |
| Website | bradamedia.com |
| Last updated | October 2026 |
Ratings
- 5.0Google19 reviews
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
Frequently asked questions
What does Jordy Brada Fotografie offer?
Jordy Brada Fotografie lists 2 services, including Photo shoot and Maternity photography.
Where is Jordy Brada Fotografie?
At Zijdepark 19, 2935 LB Ouderkerk aan den IJssel.
When is Jordy Brada Fotografie open?
Monday 09:00–17:00, Tuesday 09:00–17:00, Wednesday 09:00–17:00, Thursday 09:00–17:00, Friday 09:00–17:00, Saturday 09:00–17:00, Sunday 09:00–17:00. Check with the business before you go.
How do I book with Jordy Brada Fotografie?
Or contact the business through its website.
How is Jordy Brada Fotografie rated?
On Google, Jordy Brada Fotografie has 5.0 out of 5 from 19 reviews.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Zijdepark 19, 2935 LB Ouderkerk aan den IJssel
Jordy Brada Fotografie does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
| Monday | 09:00–17:00 |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 09:00–17:00 |
| Wednesday | 09:00–17:00 |
| Thursday | 09:00–17:00 |
| Friday | 09:00–17:00 |
| Saturday | 09:00–17:00 |
| Sunday | 09:00–17:00 |
Something not right? Suggest a correction





