De Werft schoonheidssalon
Beauty specialist · Nijkerk
5.02 reviews · GoogleDe Werft schoonheidssalon in Nijkerk is listed under Beauty specialist. On Google it has 5.0 out of 5 from 2 reviews.

About De Werft schoonheidssalon
De Werft schoonheidssalon is a beauty salon in Nijkerk. The salon offers advice and treatments focused on relaxation, skin improvement and make-up.
Treatments
The services include facials, massages, skin treatments and make-up.
- Hydrating and soothing treatment
- Anti-ageing, fruit acid and acne treatment
- Treatment of skin problems, including removal of spider naevi and fibromas
- Classic massage, connective tissue massage, Kobido Japanese facial massage and scalp massage
- Eyebrow shaping, waxing, tinting, eye mask and paraffin mask
- Day, evening and bridal make-up
Practical information
Treatments are by appointment. The salon is located on Tellerswerft in Nijkerk.
- Tellerswerft 26, Nijkerk
Brands
The salon lists Simone Mahler, Dr Renaud, Esthederm and Malu Wilz.
At a glance
| Listed under | Beauty specialist, Massage |
|---|---|
| Location | Tellerswerft 26, 3863 XG Nijkerk |
| Google rating | 5.0 out of 5 (2 reviews) |
| Phone | 033 245 6850 |
| Website | dewerftschoonheidssalon.nl |
| Last updated | 28 Oct 2026 |
Good to know
- Gift cards
- Yes
Ratings
- 5.0Google2 reviews
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
Frequently asked questions
Where is De Werft schoonheidssalon?
At Tellerswerft 26, 3863 XG Nijkerk.
How do I book with De Werft schoonheidssalon?
Call 033 245 6850. Or contact the business through its website.
How is De Werft schoonheidssalon rated?
On Google, De Werft schoonheidssalon has 5.0 out of 5 from 2 reviews.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Tellerswerft 26, 3863 XG Nijkerk
De Werft schoonheidssalon does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
Opening hours not known
Something not right? Suggest a correction





