Lemlijn Fotografie
Photographer · Maastricht
5.02 reviews · GoogleLemlijn Fotografie in Maastricht is listed under Photographer. The listing shows 3 services. On Google it has 5.0 out of 5 from 2 reviews.
About Lemlijn Fotografie
Lemlijn Fotografie shows photos of Maastricht and work for businesses. The photos are available on canvas, aluminium, plexiglass and other materials.
Photography
The portfolio includes work for businesses and locations in Maastricht, including Gaia ZOO and Maastricht Airport.
- Gaia ZOO
- Maastricht Airport
- Café Zuid Maastricht
- Maastrichts Mooiste
- Stayokay Maastricht
Photos for the wall
Photos of Maastricht are available on various materials.
- Canvas
- Aluminium
- Plexiglass
Services and prices
- Photos of Maastricht on canvas
- Photos of Maastricht on aluminium
- Photos of Maastricht on plexiglass
At a glance
| Listed under | Photographer |
|---|---|
| Location | Baron van Hövellstraat 44, 6221 VG Maastricht |
| Number of services | 3 |
| Google rating | 5.0 out of 5 (2 reviews) |
| Phone | 06 43075266 |
| Website | lemlijnfotografie.nl |
| Last updated | October 2026 |
Ratings
- 5.0Google2 reviews
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
Frequently asked questions
What does Lemlijn Fotografie offer?
Lemlijn Fotografie lists 3 services, including Photos of Maastricht on canvas, Photos of Maastricht on aluminium and Photos of Maastricht on plexiglass.
Where is Lemlijn Fotografie?
At Baron van Hövellstraat 44, 6221 VG Maastricht.
How do I book with Lemlijn Fotografie?
Call 06 43075266. Or contact the business through its website.
How is Lemlijn Fotografie rated?
On Google, Lemlijn Fotografie has 5.0 out of 5 from 2 reviews.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Baron van Hövellstraat 44, 6221 VG Maastricht
Lemlijn Fotografie does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
Opening hours not known
Something not right? Suggest a correction
