Pro-Vos
Boiler and heating · Leiden
4.36 reviews · GooglePro-Vos in Leiden is listed under Boiler and heating. The listing shows 4 services. On Google it has 4.3 out of 5 from 6 reviews.
About Pro-Vos
Pro-Vos is an installation company in Leiden. It focuses on central heating and plumbing, including leaks and installing pipes.
Work carried out
The company works on heating, gas, water and sanitary facilities. It also carries out renovations and alterations to sanitary facilities.
- Central heating
- Leaks
- Gas and water
- Renovations and alterations to sanitary facilities
How it works
Pro-Vos gives tailored advice and keeps facilities as usable as possible during the work. As a rule, one technician works on the job as your regular point of contact.
- Neat installation and handover
- One technician on the job
- Consultation with the technician
Services and prices
- Central heating
- Leaks
- Gas and water
- Renovations and alterations to sanitary facilities
At a glance
| Listed under | Boiler and heating |
|---|---|
| Location | Zoeterwoudseweg 5-A, 2321 GL Leiden |
| Number of services | 4 |
| Google rating | 4.3 out of 5 (6 reviews) |
| Phone | 071 572 4340 |
| Website | provos.nl |
| Last updated | 31 Oct 2026 |
Ratings
- 4.3Google6 reviews
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
Frequently asked questions
What does Pro-Vos offer?
Pro-Vos lists 4 services, including Central heating, Leaks, Gas and water and Renovations and alterations to sanitary facilities.
Where is Pro-Vos?
At Zoeterwoudseweg 5-A, 2321 GL Leiden.
How do I book with Pro-Vos?
Call 071 572 4340. Or contact the business through its website.
How is Pro-Vos rated?
On Google, Pro-Vos has 4.3 out of 5 from 6 reviews.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Zoeterwoudseweg 5-A, 2321 GL Leiden
Pro-Vos does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
Opening hours not known
Something not right? Suggest a correction
