Wijs met voeding
Dietitian and nutrition coach · Helmond
Wijs met voeding in Helmond is listed under Dietitian and nutrition coach. The listing shows 5 services.

About Wijs met voeding
Wijs met voeding provides nutrition guidance in Helmond. The guidance focuses on a healthy weight, more energy and a body in balance.
Approach
Alongside individual consultations, Wijs met voeding offers a three-month basic package. The guidance includes an initial consultation, food diary, body measurements, feedback and progress discussions.
- Food diary and initial consultation
- Weekly body measurement
- Feedback with tips and recipes
- Discussing difficult moments and pitfalls
- Progress
Optional components
A supermarket safari and fridge check are available as additional components.
- Supermarket safari
- Fridge check
Juice cleanse
Wijs met voeding refers to the juice cleanse from Wijs met juices as a way to get back to a healthy eating pattern.
- Juice cleanse
Services and prices
- Individual consultations
- Fit, slimmer and feeling good in 3 months
- Supermarket safari
- Fridge check
- Juice cleanse
At a glance
| Listed under | Dietitian and nutrition coach |
|---|---|
| Location | Mauritslaan 7, 5707 CM Helmond |
| Number of services | 5 |
| Phone | 06 53216150 |
| Website | wijsmetvoeding.nl |
| Last updated | October 2026 |
Frequently asked questions
What does Wijs met voeding offer?
Wijs met voeding lists 5 services, including Individual consultations, Fit, slimmer and feeling good in 3 months, Supermarket safari, Fridge check and Juice cleanse.
Where is Wijs met voeding?
At Mauritslaan 7, 5707 CM Helmond.
How do I book with Wijs met voeding?
Call 06 53216150. Or contact the business through its website.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Mauritslaan 7, 5707 CM Helmond
Wijs met voeding does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
Opening hours not known
Something not right? Suggest a correction







