Oogwereld Van Els
Optician · Heemskerk
4.343 reviews · GoogleOogwereld Van Els in Heemskerk is listed under Optician. The listing shows 5 services. On Google it has 4.3 out of 5 from 43 reviews.
About Oogwereld Van Els
Oogwereld Van Els is an optician in Heemskerk.
Services
- Glasses
- Prescription sunglasses
- Eye test
- Measuring fixation disparity
- Multifocal lenses
Services and prices
- Fitting glasses
- Prescription sunglasses lenses
- Eye test
- Measuring fixation disparity
- Multifocal lenses
At a glance
| Listed under | Optician |
|---|---|
| Location | Van Coevenhovenstraat 4, 1961 NX Heemskerk |
| Number of services | 5 |
| Google rating | 4.3 out of 5 (43 reviews) |
| Weekend | Saturday |
| Phone | 0251 232 685 |
| Website | oogwereld.nl |
| Last updated | October 2026 |
Ratings
- 4.3Google43 reviews
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
Frequently asked questions
What does Oogwereld Van Els offer?
Oogwereld Van Els lists 5 services, including Fitting glasses, Prescription sunglasses lenses, Eye test, Measuring fixation disparity and Multifocal lenses.
Where is Oogwereld Van Els?
At Van Coevenhovenstraat 4, 1961 NX Heemskerk.
When is Oogwereld Van Els open?
Tuesday 09:00–18:00, Wednesday 09:00–18:00, Thursday 09:00–18:00, Friday 09:00–18:00, Saturday 09:00–17:00. Check with the business before you go.
How do I book with Oogwereld Van Els?
Call 0251 232 685. Or contact the business through its website.
How is Oogwereld Van Els rated?
On Google, Oogwereld Van Els has 4.3 out of 5 from 43 reviews.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Van Coevenhovenstraat 4, 1961 NX Heemskerk
Oogwereld Van Els does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
| Monday | Closed |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 09:00–18:00 |
| Wednesday | 09:00–18:00 |
| Thursday | 09:00–18:00 |
| Friday | 09:00–18:00 |
| Saturday | 09:00–17:00 |
| Sunday | Closed |
Something not right? Suggest a correction
