ter Veld Boomverzorging
Tree care · Harkstede
4.69 reviews · Googleter Veld Boomverzorging in Harkstede is listed under Tree care. The listing shows 3 services. On Google it has 4.6 out of 5 from 9 reviews.

About ter Veld Boomverzorging
ter Veld Boomverzorging is a tree care company in Harkstede.
Services
- Tree care
- Pollarding trees
- Chipping branches
Practical information
- Wheelchair-accessible entrance
- Wheelchair-accessible parking
Services and prices
- Tree care
- Pollarding trees
- Chipping branches
At a glance
| Listed under | Tree care |
|---|---|
| Location | Hamweg 77, 9617 AR Harkstede |
| Number of services | 3 |
| Google rating | 4.6 out of 5 (9 reviews) |
| Weekend | Saturday |
| Phone | 06 23748321 |
| Website | terveldboomverzorging.nl |
| Last updated | October 2026 |
Ratings
- 4.6Google9 reviews
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
Frequently asked questions
What does ter Veld Boomverzorging offer?
ter Veld Boomverzorging lists 3 services, including Tree care, Pollarding trees and Chipping branches.
Where is ter Veld Boomverzorging?
At Hamweg 77, 9617 AR Harkstede.
When is ter Veld Boomverzorging open?
Monday 07:30–18:00, Tuesday 07:30–18:00, Wednesday 07:30–18:00, Thursday 07:30–18:00, Friday 07:30–18:00, Saturday 07:30–18:00. Check with the business before you go.
How do I book with ter Veld Boomverzorging?
Call 06 23748321. Or contact the business through its website.
How is ter Veld Boomverzorging rated?
On Google, ter Veld Boomverzorging has 4.6 out of 5 from 9 reviews.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Hamweg 77, 9617 AR Harkstede
ter Veld Boomverzorging does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
| Monday | 07:30–18:00 |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 07:30–18:00 |
| Wednesday | 07:30–18:00 |
| Thursday | 07:30–18:00 |
| Friday | 07:30–18:00 |
| Saturday | 07:30–18:00 |
| Sunday | Closed |
Something not right? Suggest a correction





