InEx Advocatuur B.V.
Lawyer · Groningen
InEx Advocatuur works for government, small and medium-sized businesses, the healthcare sector, and people affected by mining damage.
About InEx Advocatuur B.V.
InEx Advocatuur is a law firm in Groningen. The firm mainly works for government, small and medium-sized businesses, and the healthcare sector, and also supports people affected by mining damage.
Who we work for
InEx mainly works for business clients and also for people affected by mining damage.
- Government
- Small and medium-sized businesses
- Healthcare
- People affected by mining damage
How we work
The firm combines the personal approach of a small office with a large network. Its core values are openness, clarity, proactive action, and accuracy.
- Open
- Essence
- Proactive
- Accurate
Fees and introductory meeting
There is no charge for a first 45-minute intake meeting with a new client. A fixed price can be agreed for certain assignments.
- First 45-minute intake meeting
- Fixed price agreement for certain assignments
- Agree on a fixed number of hours per month
Practical information
The office is located on Winschoterdiep in Groningen. You can get in touch by phone, email, or through the contact form.
- Groningen
Services and prices
- Hourly rate€175
- Fixed-hour agreements
- Review contracts
- Draft settlement agreements
- Provide advice in a report
- First intake meeting45 min · €0
Prices are indicative. Check with the business before you go.
At a glance
| Listed under | Lawyer |
|---|---|
| Location | Stavangerweg 21-1, 9723 JC Groningen |
| Number of services | 6 |
| Prices | €175 |
| Website | inex.legal |
| Last updated | November 2026 |
Good to know
- Free intro
- Yes
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Stavangerweg 21-1, 9723 JC Groningen
InEx Advocatuur B.V. does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
Opening hours not known
Something not right? Suggest a correction
