Laudij Elektrotechniek
Electrician · Geleen
5.013 reviews · GoogleLaudij Elektrotechniek in Geleen is listed under Electrician. The listing shows 3 services. On Google it has 5.0 out of 5 from 13 reviews.
About Laudij Elektrotechniek
Laudij Elektrotechniek is an electrician in Geleen.
Services
- Garden lighting
- Replacing and modifying fuse boxes
- Fixing electrical faults
Services and prices
- Repairing garden lighting
- Replacing fuse boxes
- Fixing electrical faults
At a glance
| Listed under | Electrician |
|---|---|
| Location | Wolfstraat 18, 6162 BC Geleen |
| Number of services | 3 |
| Google rating | 5.0 out of 5 (13 reviews) |
| Weekend | Saturday, Sunday |
| Phone | 06 19031092 |
| Website | laudijelektro.nl |
| Last updated | October 2026 |
Ratings
- 5.0Google13 reviews
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
Frequently asked questions
What does Laudij Elektrotechniek offer?
Laudij Elektrotechniek lists 3 services, including Repairing garden lighting, Replacing fuse boxes and Fixing electrical faults.
Where is Laudij Elektrotechniek?
At Wolfstraat 18, 6162 BC Geleen.
When is Laudij Elektrotechniek open?
Monday 07:00–19:00, Tuesday 07:00–19:00, Wednesday 07:00–19:00, Thursday 07:00–19:00, Friday 07:00–19:00, Saturday 07:00–19:00, Sunday 07:00–19:00. Check with the business before you go.
How do I book with Laudij Elektrotechniek?
Call 06 19031092. Or contact the business through its website.
How is Laudij Elektrotechniek rated?
On Google, Laudij Elektrotechniek has 5.0 out of 5 from 13 reviews.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Wolfstraat 18, 6162 BC Geleen
Laudij Elektrotechniek does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
| Monday | 07:00–19:00 |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 07:00–19:00 |
| Wednesday | 07:00–19:00 |
| Thursday | 07:00–19:00 |
| Friday | 07:00–19:00 |
| Saturday | 07:00–19:00 |
| Sunday | 07:00–19:00 |
Something not right? Suggest a correction
