R.L. Hofman Timmer- en Bouwbedrijf
Handyman · Delft
2.52 reviews · GoogleR.L. Hofman Timmer- en Bouwbedrijf in Delft is listed under Handyman. The listing shows 1 services. On Google it has 2.5 out of 5 from 2 reviews.
About R.L. Hofman Timmer- en Bouwbedrijf
R.L. Hofman Timmer- en Bouwbedrijf is a carpenter and construction company in Delft.
Work
The company organizes activities related to home renovations.
- Home renovation
Services and prices
- Home renovation
At a glance
| Listed under | Handyman, Building contractor |
|---|---|
| Location | Dynamoweg 6, 2627 CH Delft |
| Number of services | 1 |
| Google rating | 2.5 out of 5 (2 reviews) |
| Weekend | Closed at the weekend |
| Phone | 015 256 7725 |
| Website | richardhofman.net |
| Last updated | October 2026 |
Ratings
- 2.5Google2 reviews
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
Frequently asked questions
What does R.L. Hofman Timmer- en Bouwbedrijf offer?
R.L. Hofman Timmer- en Bouwbedrijf lists 1 services, including Home renovation.
Where is R.L. Hofman Timmer- en Bouwbedrijf?
At Dynamoweg 6, 2627 CH Delft.
When is R.L. Hofman Timmer- en Bouwbedrijf open?
Monday 07:00–18:00, Tuesday 07:00–18:00, Wednesday 07:00–18:00, Thursday 07:00–18:00, Friday 07:00–18:00. Check with the business before you go.
How do I book with R.L. Hofman Timmer- en Bouwbedrijf?
Call 015 256 7725. Or contact the business through its website.
How is R.L. Hofman Timmer- en Bouwbedrijf rated?
On Google, R.L. Hofman Timmer- en Bouwbedrijf has 2.5 out of 5 from 2 reviews.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Dynamoweg 6, 2627 CH Delft
R.L. Hofman Timmer- en Bouwbedrijf does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
| Monday | 07:00–18:00 |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 07:00–18:00 |
| Wednesday | 07:00–18:00 |
| Thursday | 07:00–18:00 |
| Friday | 07:00–18:00 |
| Saturday | Closed |
| Sunday | Closed |
Something not right? Suggest a correction
