Coöperatie Kubus Lonen UA
Consultancy · Cuijk
2.84 reviews · GoogleCoöperatie Kubus Lonen UA in Cuijk is listed under Consultancy. The listing shows 1 services. On Google it has 2.8 out of 5 from 4 reviews.

About Coöperatie Kubus Lonen UA
Coöperatie Kubus Lonen UA provides payroll administration in Cuijk. Employers and employees can use the professional payroll software online 24/7.
Payroll administration
Kubus Lonen processes payroll for various sectors. Administration and accountancy firms can outsource their payroll administration in full or in part.
- Payroll administration
- Payroll processing
Online access
Employers and employees can access the software online. Employees can keep their payslips and annual statements close at hand.
- Payslips
- Annual statements
Practical information
Kubus Lonen can be reached on weekdays during office hours.
- Monday to Friday, 09:00–17:00
Services and prices
- Payroll administration
At a glance
| Listed under | Consultancy |
|---|---|
| Location | De Hork 21, 5431 NS Cuijk |
| Number of services | 1 |
| Google rating | 2.8 out of 5 (4 reviews) |
| Phone | 0485 350 636 |
| Website | kubuslonen.nl |
| Last updated | October 2026 |
Ratings
- 2.8Google4 reviews
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
Frequently asked questions
What does Coöperatie Kubus Lonen UA offer?
Coöperatie Kubus Lonen UA lists 1 services, including Payroll administration.
Where is Coöperatie Kubus Lonen UA?
At De Hork 21, 5431 NS Cuijk.
How do I book with Coöperatie Kubus Lonen UA?
Call 0485 350 636. Or contact the business through its website.
How is Coöperatie Kubus Lonen UA rated?
On Google, Coöperatie Kubus Lonen UA has 2.8 out of 5 from 4 reviews.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
De Hork 21, 5431 NS Cuijk
Coöperatie Kubus Lonen UA does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
Opening hours not known
Something not right? Suggest a correction







