Klus- en Onderhoudsbedrijf Brouwers
Building contractor · Breda
4.08 reviews · GoogleKlus- en Onderhoudsbedrijf Brouwers in Breda is listed under Building contractor. The listing shows 5 services. On Google it has 4.0 out of 5 from 8 reviews. The business comes to you.

About Klus- en Onderhoudsbedrijf Brouwers
Klus- en Onderhoudsbedrijf Brouwers is a home repair and maintenance company in Breda. The company carries out small and large jobs for individuals and businesses.
Specialisations
- New builds
- Remodelling and renovation
- Maintenance
- Sanitary fittings and bathrooms
- Kitchens
Requesting a quote
The company prefers to visit to discuss what you need. A quote can also be requested online.
Services and prices
- New builds
- Remodelling / Renovation
- Maintenance
- Sanitary fittings / Bathrooms
- Kitchens
At a glance
| Listed under | Building contractor |
|---|---|
| Location | 4826 KM Breda |
| Number of services | 5 |
| Google rating | 4.0 out of 5 (8 reviews) |
| Phone | 06 83167359 |
| Website | brouwersklusbedrijf.nl |
| Last updated | 31 Oct 2026 |
Ratings
- 4.0Google8 reviews
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
Frequently asked questions
What does Klus- en Onderhoudsbedrijf Brouwers offer?
Klus- en Onderhoudsbedrijf Brouwers lists 5 services, including New builds, Remodelling / Renovation, Maintenance, Sanitary fittings / Bathrooms and Kitchens.
Where is Klus- en Onderhoudsbedrijf Brouwers?
Klus- en Onderhoudsbedrijf Brouwers comes to you, in and around Breda.
How do I book with Klus- en Onderhoudsbedrijf Brouwers?
Call 06 83167359. Or contact the business through its website.
How is Klus- en Onderhoudsbedrijf Brouwers rated?
On Google, Klus- en Onderhoudsbedrijf Brouwers has 4.0 out of 5 from 8 reviews.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
4826 KM Breda
Klus- en Onderhoudsbedrijf Brouwers does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
Opening hours
Opening hours not known
Something not right? Suggest a correction







