Needlemagic Bergen op Zoom
Tattoo and piercing · Bergen op Zoom
4.5116 reviews · GoogleNeedlemagic Bergen op Zoom in Bergen op Zoom is listed under Tattoo and piercing. The listing shows 3 services. On Google it has 4.5 out of 5 from 116 reviews.
About Needlemagic Bergen op Zoom
Needlemagic Bergen op Zoom is a tattoo and piercing studio in Bergen op Zoom.
Services
- Piercing placement
- Piercing replacement
- Tattoo application
Services and prices
- Piercing placement
- Piercing replacement
- Tattoo application
At a glance
| Listed under | Tattoo and piercing |
|---|---|
| Location | Steenbergsestraat 38, 4611 TG Bergen op Zoom |
| Number of services | 3 |
| Google rating | 4.5 out of 5 (116 reviews) |
| Weekend | Saturday |
| Phone | 0164 254 177 |
| Last updated | October 2026 |
Good to know
- Emergency service
- Yes
Ratings
- 4.5Google116 reviews
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
Frequently asked questions
What does Needlemagic Bergen op Zoom offer?
Needlemagic Bergen op Zoom lists 3 services, including Piercing placement, Piercing replacement and Tattoo application.
Where is Needlemagic Bergen op Zoom?
At Steenbergsestraat 38, 4611 TG Bergen op Zoom.
When is Needlemagic Bergen op Zoom open?
Wednesday 11:00–17:00, Thursday 11:00–17:00, Friday 11:00–17:00, Saturday 11:00–17:00. Check with the business before you go.
How do I book with Needlemagic Bergen op Zoom?
Call 0164 254 177.
How is Needlemagic Bergen op Zoom rated?
On Google, Needlemagic Bergen op Zoom has 4.5 out of 5 from 116 reviews.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Steenbergsestraat 38, 4611 TG Bergen op Zoom
Needlemagic Bergen op Zoom does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
| Monday | Closed |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | Closed |
| Wednesday | 11:00–17:00 |
| Thursday | 11:00–17:00 |
| Friday | 11:00–17:00 |
| Saturday | 11:00–17:00 |
| Sunday | Closed |
Something not right? Suggest a correction
