DE COACH Amsterdam
Coach · Amsterdam-West, Amsterdam
DE COACH Amsterdam in Amsterdam is listed under Coach. The listing shows 3 services.

About DE COACH Amsterdam
DE COACH Amsterdam offers coaching, haptonomy (body-focused guidance) and constellation work in Amsterdam. Nicole combines cognitive coaching with exercises and bodywork.
Approach
The support is an in-depth tailored program adapted to the client’s personality and goals. Exercises based on haptonomic insights and systemic principles help make patterns and blocks visible and tangible.
- Coaching
- Haptonomy (body-focused guidance)
- Constellation work
Program
A program consists of an average of 6 to 8 sessions lasting 1.5 to 2 hours. At first, sessions usually take place every two weeks; the frequency is gradually reduced.
Location and introduction
Sessions usually take place in Amsterdam Oud-West, indoors or outdoors depending on the program. A program begins with an introductory walk in Vondelpark, with no obligation to continue.
Services and prices
- Coaching
- Haptonomy (body-focused guidance)
- Constellation work
At a glance
| Listed under | Coach |
|---|---|
| Location | Bosboom Toussaintstraat 46h, 1054 AT Amsterdam |
| Number of services | 3 |
| Phone | 06 16052935 |
| Website | decoach.amsterdam |
| Last updated | 28 Oct 2026 |
Good to know
- Free intro
- Yes
Frequently asked questions
What does DE COACH Amsterdam offer?
DE COACH Amsterdam lists 3 services, including Coaching, Haptonomy (body-focused guidance) and Constellation work.
Where is DE COACH Amsterdam?
At Bosboom Toussaintstraat 46h, 1054 AT Amsterdam.
How do I book with DE COACH Amsterdam?
Call 06 16052935. Or contact the business through its website.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Bosboom Toussaintstraat 46h, 1054 AT Amsterdam
DE COACH Amsterdam does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
Opening hours not known
Something not right? Suggest a correction







