Wendy Peeters
Coach · Sprang-Capelle
Wendy Peeters works as a simulation actor, coach and Voice Dialogue facilitator.

About Wendy Peeters
Wendy Peeters is a simulation actor, coach and Voice Dialogue facilitator. As a simulation actor, she works for healthcare, social services and education, among other sectors.
Simulation acting
Wendy acts out realistic, tailored situations so participants can practise and receive feedback. She creates a safe atmosphere with room for experimentation and discovery.
- Tailored behaviour
- Feedback for participants
- Role-play and director’s theatre
Coaching with Voice Dialogue
In individual conversations, inner voices are given space. Voice Dialogue and systemic work help explore the inner world and experience greater awareness and freedom of choice.
- Individual session
- Workshop with a group
Training
Through Inner Practice, Voice Dialogue training is provided for groups. Participants experience the method, observe and practise the skill step by step.
- Voice Dialogue in groups
- Courses through Inner Practice
Background
Wendy has completed training in drama, theatre, personal leadership, mindfulness and systemic work.
- Higher professional education in social work (drama)
- Theatre school
- Personal leadership
- Mindfulness
- Systemic work
Services and prices
- Simulation actor
- Voice Dialogue coaching
- Voice Dialogue workshop
- Individual Voice Dialogue session
- Voice Dialogue training in groups
At a glance
| Listed under | Coach |
|---|---|
| Location | Achter de Hoven 17, 5161 BT Sprang-Capelle |
| Number of services | 5 |
| Phone | 06 12163495 |
| Website | wendy-peeters.nl |
| Last updated | November 2026 |
Good to know
- Founded
- 2000
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Achter de Hoven 17, 5161 BT Sprang-Capelle
Wendy Peeters does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
Opening hours not known
Something not right? Suggest a correction







