Smart Clean | Schoonmaakdiensten
Cleaning company · Velp
5.012 reviews · GoogleSmartClean cleans solar panels and applies a protective coating that repels dirt and dust.
About Smart Clean | Schoonmaakdiensten
SmartClean is a solar panel cleaning company in Velp. It cleans solar panels and offers a protective coating and maintenance planning.
Solar panel cleaning
The SmartClean Method combines proactive planning with preventive cleaning and protection of solar panels.
- Solar panel cleaning
- SmartClean Shield protective coating
- Inspection and reporting
- Video footage of the work on request
Working method and safety
Work is scheduled together, and the cleaning frequency is determined by agreement. A risk assessment is made for every job and an LMRA (Last Minute Risk Analysis) is carried out on site.
- Task Risk Analysis (TRA)
- Last Minute Risk Analysis (LMRA)
- Work equipment inspected annually
- Working safely at height
Practical information
An introductory meeting can be scheduled.
- No-obligation introductory meeting
- Request cleaning or a quote
Services and prices
- Solar panel cleaning
- SmartClean Shield
At a glance
| Listed under | Cleaning company, Window cleaner |
|---|---|
| Location | 6883 JL Velp |
| Number of services | 2 |
| Google rating | 5.0 out of 5 (12 reviews) |
| Weekend | Saturday |
| Accessibility | Wheelchair-accessible parking |
| Phone | 06 52330526 |
| Website | smartclean.nl |
| Last updated | November 2026 |
Good to know
- Brands
- SmartClean Shield
- Free intro
- Yes
- Founded
- 2019
Ratings
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
6883 JL Velp
Smart Clean | Schoonmaakdiensten does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
Opening hours
| Monday | 06:00–18:00 |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 06:00–18:00 |
| Wednesday | 06:00–18:00 |
| Thursday | 06:00–18:00 |
| Friday | 06:00–18:00 |
| Saturday | 06:00–18:00 |
| Sunday | Closed |
Something not right? Suggest a correction
