Lorenly.

Partner Advocatuur en Mediaton

Lawyer · Terneuzen

4.028 reviews · Google

Partner Advocaten provides legal assistance and mediation in Terneuzen and Terneuzen.

About Partner Advocatuur en Mediaton

Partner Advocaten is a law firm with its main office in Terneuzen and a branch office in Terneuzen. It specialises in personal and family law, employment law and tenancy law, and also offers mediation.

Areas of law and approach

The firm tries to prevent legal proceedings where possible and resolve disputes through mutual agreement or mediation. If court proceedings are necessary, it represents clients’ interests.

  • Personal and family law
  • Employment law
  • Tenancy law
  • Mediation

Initial consultation and costs

The first intake meeting is free and lasts up to 30 minutes. During the first meeting, the firm checks whether the client is eligible for subsidised legal aid and handles the application.

  • Free intake meeting of up to 30 minutes
  • Apply for subsidised legal aid

Offices

The main office is in Terneuzen, with a branch office in Hulst.

  • Terneuzen
  • Hulst

Services and prices

  • Mediation
  • First free intake meeting30 min · €0
  • Employment law
  • Tenancy law
  • Personal and family law

At a glance

Listed underLawyer
LocationLange Reksestraat 21-c, 4538 AZ Terneuzen
Number of services5
Google rating4.0 out of 5 (28 reviews)
WeekendClosed at the weekend
Phone0115 631 256
Websitepartner-advocaten.nl
Last updatedNovember 2026

Good to know

Free intro
Yes

Ratings

Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.

This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.

Contact

Lange Reksestraat 21-c, 4538 AZ Terneuzen

Partner Advocatuur en Mediaton does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.

The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.

Opening hours

Monday08:30–17:00
Tuesday08:30–17:00
Wednesday08:30–17:00
Thursday08:30–17:00
Friday08:30–17:00
SaturdayClosed
SundayClosed

Something not right? Suggest a correction