Tandartspraktijk Capellekade
Dentist · Steenwijk
5.07 reviews · GoogleDental practice in Steenwijk for check-ups, oral hygiene and dental treatments.
About Tandartspraktijk Capellekade
Tandartspraktijk Capellekade is a dental practice in Steenwijk. The team provides oral care, from check-ups and cleaning to more extensive treatments.
Services
The practice treats teeth, gums and the rest of the mouth. The team discusses the treatment and explains what will happen.
- Preventive check-ups
- Periodontal treatments and dental cleaning
- Children’s dentistry
- Composite fillings
- Dental anxiety and trauma support
- Root canal treatment
- Tooth extractions
- Implant crowns or bridges
Approach
The practice takes time to listen, explains treatments and discusses the steps in advance. Children are guided calmly and playfully.
Practice
The practice is located at Capellekade 10, in a historic building on the Dolderkanaal.
Services and prices
- (Half-)yearly check-up
- Periodontal treatments
- Dental cleaning
- Children’s dentistry
- Composite fillings
- Root canal treatment
- Tooth extractions
- Implant crowns or bridges
At a glance
| Listed under | Dentist |
|---|---|
| Location | Capellekade 10, 8331 KX Steenwijk |
| Number of services | 8 |
| Google rating | 5.0 out of 5 (7 reviews) |
| Weekend | Closed at the weekend |
| Accessibility | Wheelchair-accessible entrance, Wheelchair-accessible parking |
| Phone | 0521 522 699 |
| Website | tandartspraktijkcapellekade.nl |
| Last updated | November 2026 |
Good to know
- Emergency service
- Yes
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Capellekade 10, 8331 KX Steenwijk
Tandartspraktijk Capellekade does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
| Monday | 08:00–17:00 |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 08:00–17:00 |
| Wednesday | 08:00–17:00 |
| Thursday | 08:00–17:00 |
| Friday | Closed |
| Saturday | Closed |
| Sunday | Closed |
Something not right? Suggest a correction
