Coachpraktijk Rianne Weijer
Coach · Steenwijk
5.015 reviews · GoogleCoachpraktijk Rianne Weijer works in Steenwijk with PSYCH-K® on stress, beliefs and recurring patterns.
About Coachpraktijk Rianne Weijer
Coachpraktijk Rianne Weijer is a coaching practice in Steenwijk. Rianne uses PSYCH-K® to address stress, limiting beliefs and recurring patterns.
Approach
The sessions focus on beliefs and patterns that the client wants to change. Simple muscle testing is used to make contact with the subconscious, followed by a Balance. Clients remain conscious and stay in control.
Programme and session
The Transformatie Traject consists of six sessions with contact in between. A Transformatie sessie focuses on what is holding the client back at that moment.
- Transformatie Traject: six sessions of 45 to 60 minutes
- Transformatie sessie: 45 to 60 minutes
Locations
Introductory sessions can take place in Staphorst, Steenwijk, Nijholtpade or online.
- Staphorst
- Steenwijk
- Nijholtpade
- Online
Services and prices
- Introductory session€35
- Transformatie Traject€545
- Transformatie sessie€95
Prices are indicative. Check with the business before you go.
At a glance
| Listed under | Coach |
|---|---|
| Location | Oostercluft 352, 8332 DP Steenwijk |
| Number of services | 3 |
| Prices | €35 – €545 |
| Google rating | 5.0 out of 5 (15 reviews) |
| Weekend | Saturday, Sunday |
| Phone | 06 19079194 |
| Website | coachsteenwijk.nl |
| Last updated | November 2026 |
Ratings
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Oostercluft 352, 8332 DP Steenwijk
Coachpraktijk Rianne Weijer does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
| Monday | 09:00–17:00 |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 09:00–17:00 |
| Wednesday | 09:00–17:00 |
| Thursday | 09:00–17:00 |
| Friday | 09:00–17:00 |
| Saturday | 09:00–17:00 |
| Sunday | 09:00–17:00 |
Something not right? Suggest a correction
