fotografie.lianne
Photographer · Staphorst (kern)
5.036 reviews · GooglePhotographer from Staphorst for candid photoshoots and reports, specializing in working with children.
About fotografie.lianne
Fotografie.lianne is a photographer from Staphorst. She takes photoshoots and reports in natural colors and specializes in working with children.
Photoshoots and reports
Lianne takes candid images that capture personal stories. She works in a relaxed atmosphere and has experience with children from her work in childcare.
- Family photoshoot
- Newborn photoshoot
- Maternity photoshoot
- Family photoshoot
- Portrait photoshoot
- Wedding report
- Birth report
- Farewell report
Approach
Personal contact and a pleasant, relaxed atmosphere are central. The personal gallery is delivered by email within two weeks.
Service area
Lianne is based in Staphorst and works throughout the Netherlands.
- Throughout the Netherlands
Services and prices
- Family photoshoot
- Newborn photoshoot
- Maternity photoshoot
- Family photoshoot
- Portrait photoshoot
- Wedding report
- Birth report
- Farewell report
At a glance
| Listed under | Photographer |
|---|---|
| Location | Russchersland 26, 7951 HJ Staphorst |
| Number of services | 8 |
| Google rating | 5.0 out of 5 (36 reviews) |
| Weekend | Saturday, Sunday |
| Accessibility | Wheelchair-accessible parking |
| Phone | 06 11686425 |
| Website | fotografie-lianne.nl |
| Last updated | November 2026 |
Good to know
- Gift cards
- Yes
Ratings
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Russchersland 26, 7951 HJ Staphorst
fotografie.lianne does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
| Monday | 08:30–21:00 |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 08:30–21:00 |
| Wednesday | 08:30–21:00 |
| Thursday | 08:30–21:00 |
| Friday | 08:30–21:00 |
| Saturday | 08:30–21:00 |
| Sunday | 08:30–21:00 |
Something not right? Suggest a correction
