Dakdekker Papendrecht
Roofer · Papendrecht
5.08 reviews · GoogleDakdekker Papendrecht connects customers with roofers for repairs, maintenance and renovation.

About Dakdekker Papendrecht
Dakdekker Papendrecht puts customers in touch with roofers in their area. Customers can request a quote for roofing work via the website, such as repairs, maintenance or a new roof.
Roofing work
Dakdekker Papendrecht carries out work ranging from roof repairs and maintenance to renovation and new roofs.
- Lay roof tiles
- Fix roof leaks
- Replace gutters
- Clean gutters
- Install an EPDM roof
- Repair chimneys
- Install bitumen roofing
- Roof repair
- Roof maintenance
- Roof renovation
Work process
Customers describe their roof problem or requirements and can request a free, no-obligation quote. Inspections and work are then scheduled.
- Request a quote via the website
- Schedule an inspection and work
Availability
Dakdekker Papendrecht is available 24/7. In urgent cases, such as a roof leak, the company tries to come by as soon as possible.
Services and prices
- Lay roof tiles
- Fix roof leaks
- Replace gutters
- Clean gutters
- Install an EPDM roof
- Chimney repair
- Install bitumen roofing
- Roof repair
- Roof maintenance
- Roof renovation
At a glance
| Listed under | Roofer, Handyman, Building contractor, Insulation |
|---|---|
| Location | 3356 LE Papendrecht |
| Number of services | 10 |
| Google rating | 5.0 out of 5 (8 reviews) |
| Weekend | Saturday, Sunday |
| Phone | 078 369 0289 |
| Website | dakdekkerpapendrecht.net |
| Last updated | November 2026 |
Good to know
- Emergency service
- Yes
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
3356 LE Papendrecht
Dakdekker Papendrecht does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
Opening hours
| Monday | 07:00–22:00 |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 07:00–22:00 |
| Wednesday | 07:00–22:00 |
| Thursday | 07:00–22:00 |
| Friday | 07:00–22:00 |
| Saturday | 07:00–22:00 |
| Sunday | 07:00–22:00 |
Something not right? Suggest a correction





