Lorenly.

Herenkappers Rimmelzwaan

Hairdresser · Leidschendam

4.8116 reviews · Google

Herenkappers Rimmelzwaan offers haircuts, beard trimming and classic shaving in Leidschendam.

About Herenkappers Rimmelzwaan

Herenkappers Rimmelzwaan is a men's hair salon in Leidschendam. Three barbers work there in a nostalgic atmosphere with retro materials and vintage details.

Services

The salon offers haircut and styling treatments, beard care and classic shaving.

  • Cut & style
  • Wash, cut & style
  • Beard trim
  • Classic shave / Classic hot towel shave
  • Boys up to and including 11 years old

Atmosphere

The salon has a nostalgic atmosphere with retro materials and vintage details. Pomades and beard oils are part of the experience.

Practical information

The salon is located on Prins Hendriklaan in Leidschendam and has parking.

  • Tuesday through Friday: 8:00–17:30
  • Saturday: 8:00–16:00
  • Closed Sunday and Monday

Services and prices

  • Cut & style€33
  • Wash, cut & style€37
  • Beard trim€20
  • Classic shave
  • Classic hot towel shave
  • Boys up to and including 11 years old€31

Prices are indicative. Check with the business before you go.

At a glance

Listed underHairdresser
LocationPrins Hendriklaan 57-A, 2264 ST Leidschendam
Number of services6
Prices€20 – €37
Google rating4.8 out of 5 (116 reviews)
WeekendSaturday
AccessibilityWheelchair-accessible entrance, Wheelchair-accessible parking
Phone070 327 3513
Websiteherenkappers-rimmelzwaan.nl
Last updatedNovember 2026

Ratings

Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.

This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.

Contact

Prins Hendriklaan 57-A, 2264 ST Leidschendam

Herenkappers Rimmelzwaan does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.

The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.

Opening hours

MondayClosed
Tuesday08:00–17:30
Wednesday08:00–17:30
Thursday08:00–17:30
Friday08:00–17:30
Saturday08:00–16:00
SundayClosed

Something not right? Suggest a correction