SoulSisters Beautybar
Beauty specialist · Gouda North
4.730+ reviews · GoogleSoulSisters Beautybar in Gouda offers facials, nail, eyelash and eyebrow treatments.

About SoulSisters Beautybar
SoulSisters Beautybar is a beauty salon in Gouda. The salon offers treatments for eyebrows, eyelashes, the face and nails, and works with Dermalogica products.
Treatments
Brow Lamination lifts the eyebrow hairs; the effect stays in shape for up to six weeks. The lash lift/botox lifts the eyelashes and takes 45 to 60 minutes.
- Browlift/lamination
- Lashlift/botox
- Facials, tailored to the skin’s needs
- Gel polish
Skincare
Facials are tailored to skin needs and preferences, based on a consultation and Face Mapping skin analysis. Dermalogica products are available for purchase at the salon for home use.
- Skin Health
- Age Smart
- Ultra Calming
- Active Clearing
- Clear Start
- Body Collection
- Powerbright
Practical information
The salon is located on Van Limburg Stirumstraat in Gouda. SoulSisters Beautybar has been operating since 2020.
Services and prices
- Browlift/lamination
- Lashlift/botox45 min
- Facials
- Gel polish
At a glance
| Listed under | Beauty specialist |
|---|---|
| Location | Van Limburg Stirumstraat 3, 2805 BB Gouda |
| Number of services | 4 |
| Google rating | 4.7 out of 5 (30+ reviews) |
| Weekend | Saturday |
| Phone | 06 34391616 |
| Website | soulsistersbeautybar.nl |
| Last updated | November 2026 |
Good to know
- Brands
- Dermalogica
- Founded
- 2020
Ratings
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Van Limburg Stirumstraat 3, 2805 BB Gouda
SoulSisters Beautybar does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
| Monday | Closed |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | Closed |
| Wednesday | 09:30–17:00 |
| Thursday | 09:30–17:00 |
| Friday | Closed |
| Saturday | 09:30–17:00 |
| Sunday | Closed |
Something not right? Suggest a correction





