Amber4dogs
Pet grooming · Den Ham
4.912 reviews · GoogleAmber4Dogs grooms dogs in Den Ham with treatments tailored to each dog.

About Amber4dogs
Amber4Dogs is a grooming salon in Den Ham specialising in dog coat care. Treatments are tailored to the dog’s breed, coat type, character and needs.
Treatments
The salon offers washing and drying, deshedding, clipping and shaping, hand-stripping and full grooming. Dogs can also be washed and dried only; owners can wash their dog themselves in the salon.
- Washing and drying
- Deshedding
- Clipping and styling
- Clipping and shaping
- Hand-stripping
- Full grooming
- Self-service dog washing in the salon
Grooming
As part of full grooming, nails can be trimmed and ears and eyes can be cared for. The appropriate treatment is discussed in advance.
- Nail trimming
- Ear care
- Eye cleaning
Approach
The salon takes time to help dogs feel at ease and monitors their wellbeing. Trainees learn the trade under Amber’s supervision.
About Amber4Dogs
The salon has one qualified dog groomer with 10 years of experience and is an erkend leerbedrijf (accredited training company). The salon has air conditioning.
- Air conditioning
Services and prices
- Clipping and styling
- Washing and blow-drying
- Deshedding
- Full grooming
- Basic
- Clipping
- Hand-stripping
- Self-service washing
At a glance
| Listed under | Pet grooming, Dog trainer |
|---|---|
| Location | Voorveldsweg 6, 7683 RZ Den Ham |
| Number of services | 8 |
| Google rating | 4.9 out of 5 (12 reviews) |
| Accessibility | Wheelchair-accessible parking |
| Phone | 06 20179809 |
| Website | amber4dogs.nl |
| Last updated | November 2026 |
Ratings
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Voorveldsweg 6, 7683 RZ Den Ham
Amber4dogs does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
Opening hours not known
Something not right? Suggest a correction





