MannenBrein
Coach · Dapperbuurt, Amsterdam East
4.875+ reviews · GoogleMannenBrein guides women with coaching, workshops and online courses about love and relationships.

About MannenBrein
MannenBrein is a coaching company in Amsterdam. It guides women in developing their love blueprint and understanding men, dating and relationships.
Coaching and programmes
There are personal programmes, workshops and online courses about patterns in love, self-confidence and relationships.
- 1-to-1 coaching
- Private coaching
- The Love Power Workshop
- The Family Constellations Workshop
- You Are the Prize
- Getting and Keeping the Man of Your Dreams
- Chat to His Heart
- The secret of a happy relationship
- The Love Blueprint
About MannenBrein
Mathijs Dingjan works with the MannenBrein team. The company also offers articles, podcasts and success stories about love and relationships.
- Articles about dating, relationships and psychological challenges
- Podcast about love and relationships
- Participants’ transformation stories
Services and prices
- 1-to-1 coaching
- Living in Love
- Private coaching
- The Love Power Workshop
- The Family Constellations Workshop
- You Are the Prize
- Getting and Keeping the Man of Your Dreams
- Chat to His Heart
- The secret of a happy relationship
- The Love Blueprint
At a glance
| Listed under | Coach |
|---|---|
| Location | Commelinstraat 248, 1093 VD Amsterdam |
| Number of services | 10 |
| Google rating | 4.8 out of 5 (75+ reviews) |
| Appointments | Appointment recommended |
| Phone | 085 130 4977 |
| Website | mannenbrein.nl |
| Last updated | November 2026 |
Good to know
- Free intro
- Yes
Ratings
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
Commelinstraat 248, 1093 VD Amsterdam
MannenBrein does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
Opening hours not known
Something not right? Suggest a correction





