Clear.bio
Dietitian and nutrition coach · Amsterdam
3.49 reviews · GoogleClear.bio offers a digital nutrition programme with glucose monitoring and coaching for people with type 2 diabetes.

About Clear.bio
Clear.bio offers a digital nutrition programme in Amsterdam for people with type 2 diabetes. The programme combines a glucose sensor, the Clear.bio app and coaching from nutrition coaches.
Treatment
The programme consists of a two-week start phase, eight weeks of personalised advice and adjustments, and a two-week period during which meals are recorded again.
- Glucose sensor
- Clear.bio app
- Coaching from nutrition coaches
- Clear.bio Check
How it works
The sensor measures glucose levels and sends them to the app. Participants record meals, see how they respond to food and can ask questions via chat.
Reimbursement
The treatment is reimbursed under ketenzorg diabetes (Dutch integrated diabetes care) in some of the listed regions. Clear.bio offers help with registration.
- Amsterdam
- Breda
- Eindhoven
- Rotterdam
- West-Friesland
- Zoetermeer
Services and prices
- Clear.bio treatment
- Clear.bio Check
At a glance
| Listed under | Dietitian and nutrition coach, Holistic therapy |
|---|---|
| Location | 1076 CV Amsterdam |
| Number of services | 2 |
| Google rating | 3.4 out of 5 (9 reviews) |
| Weekend | Closed at the weekend |
| Languages | English, French, Dutch, German |
| Accessibility | Wheelchair-accessible entrance, Wheelchair-accessible parking, Wheelchair-accessible seating |
| Phone | 020 308 6165 |
| Website | clear.bio |
| Last updated | November 2026 |
Good to know
- Brands
- Clear.bio
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
1076 CV Amsterdam
Clear.bio does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
Opening hours
| Monday | 09:00–18:00 |
|---|---|
| Tuesday | 09:00–18:00 |
| Wednesday | 09:00–18:00 |
| Thursday | 09:00–18:00 |
| Friday | 09:00–18:00 |
| Saturday | Closed |
| Sunday | Closed |
Something not right? Suggest a correction






