Avizor Advocaten en Arbiters
Lawyer · Willemspark, Amsterdam South
5.02 reviews · GoogleAvizor advises on litigation strategy and represents clients in Dutch and international proceedings.

About Avizor Advocaten en Arbiters
Avizor Advocaten en Arbiters is a law and arbitration firm in Amsterdam. The firm advises on litigation strategy and represents clients before Dutch courts and in international arbitration.
Litigation and arbitration
The firm advises on litigation strategy, represents clients, and acts as an arbitrator. It also handles the enforcement of court judgments and arbitral awards.
- Litigation strategy
- Representation before Dutch courts
- International arbitration
- Acting as an arbitrator
- Enforcement of court judgments and arbitral awards
Commercial and company law
Avizor specialises in commercial and company law and advises on good corporate governance.
- Fraud, corruption, and directors' liability
- Good corporate governance
Languages
The firm advises and represents clients in six languages.
- Dutch
- English
- Spanish
- French
- German
- Danish
Services and prices
- Litigation strategy
- Representation before Dutch courts
- International arbitration
- Acting as an arbitrator
- Enforcement of court judgments and arbitral awards
- Assistance with fraud, corruption, and directors' liability
- Advice on good corporate governance
At a glance
| Listed under | Lawyer |
|---|---|
| Location | De Lairessestraat 131-135 III, 1075 HJ Amsterdam |
| Number of services | 7 |
| Google rating | 5.0 out of 5 (2 reviews) |
| Languages | Dutch, English, Spanish, French, German, Danish |
| Phone | 020 717 3414 |
| Website | avizor.eu |
| Last updated | November 2026 |
This listing is based on public information, such as the business's own website. It can contain mistakes.
Contact
De Lairessestraat 131-135 III, 1075 HJ Amsterdam
Avizor Advocaten en Arbiters does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
The map loads from Google Maps when you open it.
Opening hours
Opening hours not known
Something not right? Suggest a correction






