No-Nonsens Administratie, Accountancy & Consultancy
Accountant · 2e Exloermond
2.05+ reviews · GoogleNo-Nonsens provides administration, bookkeeping and payroll administration for businesses and hospitality in 2e Exloermond.

About No-Nonsens Administratie, Accountancy & Consultancy
No-Nonsens Administratie, Accountancy & Consultancy provides administration, bookkeeping and financial services in 2e Exloermond. The firm also focuses on payroll administration and hospitality administration.
Services
The firm provides full or partial administrative and financial services for different types of businesses.
- Administration
- Bookkeeping
- Accounts receivable management and outsourced invoicing
- Annual accounts
- Online bookkeeping and administration
- Payroll administration
- Hospitality administration
Who it serves
The services are aimed at self-employed professionals and different types of businesses. The firm provides financial services and administration for hospitality businesses.
- Self-employed professionals
- Sole proprietorships
- VOF (general partnership)
- BV (private limited company)
- NV (public limited company)
- CV (limited partnership)
- Hospitality businesses
Switching
The firm offers a free switching service. You can switch at any time of year.
- Free switching service
Services
- Administration
- Bookkeeping
- Accounts receivable management
- Outsourced invoicing
- Annual accounts
- Online bookkeeping /administration
- Payroll administration
- Hospitality administration
- Switching service
At a glance
| Listed under | Accountant |
|---|---|
| Location | 2e Exloermond |
| Google rating | 2.0 out of 5 (5+ reviews) |
| Languages | Dutch, English |
| Accessibility | Wheelchair-accessible parking |
| Phone | 06 83898641 |
| Website | no-nonsens.eu |
| Last updated | November 2026 |
Ratings
Ratings belong to the platforms named. Read the reviews there.
Contact
2e Exloermond
No-Nonsens Administratie, Accountancy & Consultancy does not manage this listing yet. Contact the business directly.
Something not right? Suggest a correction






